Article is in development!
Some short arguments for the beginning! :-)
The article will be developed!
The nuclear fusion scammists claim, that they would produce "peaceful" energy similar to Sun, by "fusion" of hydrogen.
The problem is, that the Sun is destroying mater because of huge pressure by its mass and turning it into energy, which is emitted out to the space. As a byproduct of this process, by investing part of the energy some bigger elements are produced. Hydroge atoms is melted to Helium and other bigger elements and their isotopes.
When some instable isotopes are cracked, like it is done isotopes with Uranium, Plutonium or Hydrogen, each released Neutron turn into a Proton, Electron and some energy particles. This is the energy which can be used for heating water to turn turbines for production of electricity.
Fusion reactor is one of the biggest scientific frauds. Fission releases energy, but fusion always absorbs!
Fusion will never produce energy because it consumes more energy! They aren't fusion but fission reactors!
The fusion is a energy consuming byproduct. It is a waste of the process, which is fission not fusion.
It is always fusion, as heavy hydrogen isotopes are cracked. Fission helium is its waste byproduct.
Fusion will never produce energy because it consumes more energy! They aren't fusion but fission reactors!
The fusion is a energy consuming byproduct. It is a waste of the process, which is fission not fusion.
It is always fusion, as heavy hydrogen isotopes are cracked. Fission helium is its waste byproduct.
Therefore whole idea is a scam!
The use for this reactors heavy water to crack the neutrons from the core. Cracking out neutrons is fission!
Bram Cohen: Will we ever generate more energy out of nuclear fusion than we put in?
https://www.quora.com/Will-we-ever-generate-more-energy-out-of-nuclear-fusion-than-we-put-in
The use for this reactors heavy water to crack the neutrons from the core. Cracking out neutrons is fission!
Bram Cohen: Will we ever generate more energy out of nuclear fusion than we put in?
https://www.quora.com/Will-we-ever-generate-more-energy-out-of-nuclear-fusion-than-we-put-in
"Due to having to create artificial pressure by using electromagnetism instead of stars using gravity, will we ever gather more energy than what we use to pressurize the hydrogen in the first place?"
hallo Enkidu, hiervon verstehe ich ja mal so gar nichts ....
ReplyDeleteDieses Thema werde ich mit der Zeit weiter ausführen, aber im Prinzip kannst Du es Dir so vorstellen. Die Zerstörung von Holz oder Kohle durch Verbrennung, erzeugt Asche und Wärme.
DeleteWenn aber jemand behaupten würde, durch die Verschmelzung von Asche entstünde Wärme, wäre das doch absurd, oder?
Analog ähnlich ist es mit der Spaltung und Fusion von Atomkernen. Die Spaltung setzt Energie frei, indem die Neutronen sich auflösen. Umgekehrt geht es nicht.
Auch bei den sog. Fusionskraftwerken werden vornehmlich Neutronen aus schweren Wasserstoffisotopen freigesetzt, die entsprechend viel Energie freisetzen. Dadurch entstehen als energieabsorbierendes Abfallprodukt wenige Heliumatome. Deshalb nennen sie es "Fusion".
So könnte man die Kohleverbrennung nicht Verbrennung, sondern "Veraschung" nennen und behaupten, die Bildung von Asche wäre unser Ziel.